Testing retained sowing seed of hybrid canola over a range of rainfall zones
Author: Trent Potter | Date: 05 Feb 2014
Trent Potter,
Yeruga Crop Research
Take home messages
- Average yield loss of canola grown from retained hybrid seed varied from site to site, but ranged from 7-17% when compared to the commercial hybrid sowing seed.
- Oil content of crops grown from retained hybrid seed was significantly lower than that from commercial hybrids.
- While some hybrids were less affected by using retained seed it is recommended that new seed is purchased each year.
Background
Canola hybrids are now available in Australia covering conventional, Clearfield®, triazine tolerant and Roundup Ready® herbicide systems. As farmers are used to sowing retained seed from open pollinated crops, they may wish to retain sowing seed harvested from the previous hybrid crop to reduce the up-front cost of sowing a canola crop. Little independent research has evaluated the effect on plant growth, blackleg resistance and grain yield. It is important that farmers have credible information as to the effect of retaining hybrid seed in all rainfall zones.
Recent on-farm research
On-farm research has previously been conducted as part of the Better Oilseeds project but only based on one hybrid variety. This research showed reduction in blackleg resistance in the retained hybrid seed but variable grain yield responses. Additional research has been conducted by Pacific Seeds that showed significant yield reductions by retaining hybrid seed. This research, however, only tested Pacific Seeds hybrids and used seed harvested from yield plots and so would be expected to have some contamination from previously harvested plots.
This preliminary work highlights a need for further on-farm research to determine the effect of retaining hybrid sowing seed on plant growth, blackleg resistance and grain yield for the range of herbicide tolerance options over a range of rainfall zones in southern Australia.
Research objective
This research program aimed to conduct a series of trials in 2012 to measure the effect of retaining hybrid sowing seed on plant growth, blackleg resistance and grain yield compared to the original hybrid (ie. as purchased from seed supplier; referred to as ‘commercial’ here after) for a range of herbicide tolerance options in a range of rainfall zones in southern Australia.
Methodology
Replicated trials were conducted at four locations within different rainfall zones in South Australia. Site locations were Minnipa and Lameroo for low rainfall conditions, Bordertown for a medium rainfall site and Bool Lagoon for a high rainfall site. Plot size was 10 meters long by eight rows and three replicates were sown. Trials were conducted to compare the original hybrid seed with first generation farmer retained hybrid seed. Retained hybrid sowing seed was sourced from individual farmers commercial crops from 2011 to reduce the possibility of contamination in samples harvested from small plot yield trials.
Conventional (Hyola®50 plus CB™Taurus at Bool Lagoon), Clearfield (Pioneer®45Y77, 45Y82, 46Y83 and Hyola® 575CL) and triazine tolerant (CB™Tumby HT™ and CB™Jardee HT™) hybrids were assessed. All seed was graded and assessed for germination to ensure good quality seed was used. Treatments under test were the retained hybrid seed plus and minus a fungicide treatment compared to the original hybrid seed also plus and minus a fungicide treatment. Varieties with the same herbicide tolerance were sown in groups to reduce the risk of damage by herbicides.
Plant vigour, internal blackleg infection, grain yield and oil content were measured.
Results
Flowering dates
Very little variation occurred for flowering date between the commercial hybrid and the retained sowing seed with only about one day difference in days to 50 per cent of plants having first flowers.
Early vigour
Some hybrids showed reduced early vigour when sown with retained seed, but the response was variable.
Blackleg
Internal infection with blackleg was scored at three sites. A significant interaction between hybrid and seed type occurred at Lameroo and Bordertown with no significance at Bool Lagoon (Table 1). Several hybrids showed increased internal infection when sowing seed was retained.
Table 1. Internal blackleg infection (%) at three sites in 2012
|
Lameroo |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45Y77 |
45Y82 |
46Y83 |
Hyola50 |
Hyola575CL |
CB Jardee HT |
CB Tumby HT |
||
Commercial |
20.7 e |
12.1 c |
8.4 c |
1.8 a |
5.5 b |
21.8 de |
22.8de |
|
Retained |
21.4 de |
27.5 e |
13.1 c |
8.4 b |
4.2 b |
24.1 e |
17.5 d |
|
|
Bool Lagoon |
|||||||
45Y77 |
45Y82 |
46Y83 |
Hyola50 |
Hyola575CL |
CB Jardee HT |
CB Tumby HT |
Taurus |
|
Commercial |
19.4 |
17.7 |
8.7 |
1.5 |
4.1 |
28.5 |
38.9 |
3.0 |
Retained |
21.5 |
22.7 |
9.1 |
7.3 |
4.7 |
27.8 |
34.1 |
4.0 |
|
Bordertown |
|||||||
45Y77 |
45Y82 |
46Y83 |
Hyola50 |
Hyola575CL |
CB Jardee HT |
CB Tumby HT |
||
Commercial |
68.5 f |
54.6 e |
46.5 d |
4.8 a |
9.9 b |
87.5 g |
96.8 h |
|
Retained |
71.8 f |
57 e |
60.3 e |
24.6 c |
12.8 bc |
86.8 g |
94.9 gh |
Note: Within table, values followed by a different letter are significantly different.
When hybrid seed was retained, Jockey® was needed to be applied to get a similar low level of blackleg as that produced by the commercial hybrid seed, except at Bordertown where very high levels of blackleg occurred (Table 2).
Table 2. Internal blackleg infection (%) affected by seed type and fungicide at three sites in 2012
Lameroo |
Bordertown |
Bool Lagoon |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment |
Jockey |
Nil |
Jockey |
Nil |
Jockey |
Nil |
Commercial |
10.9 a |
15.7 b |
47.5 a |
57.9 b |
13.3 a |
17.2 b |
Retained |
12.6 a |
20.6 c |
57.2 b |
57.7 b |
16.3 ab |
16.5 ab |
Note: Within table, values followed by a different letter are significantly different.
Grain yield
Grain yield was significantly higher for commercial over retained hybrid sowing seed at all sites except Bool Lagoon (Table 3), with the greatest percentage yield loss at the two lower rainfall sites of Minnipa and Lameroo. Overall yield loss ranged from seven to 17 per cent over all hybrids.
Table 3. Mean grain yield (kg/ha) for hybrid sowing seed in 2012
Site | Commercial | Retained | % Commercial |
---|---|---|---|
Kg/ ha | Kg/ ha | % | |
Bool Lagoon | 2,394 a | 2,228 a | 93 |
Bordertown | 1,668 a | 1,503 b | 90 |
Lameroo | 830 a | 693 b | 83 |
Minnipa | 572 a | 485 b | 85 |
Table 4. Grain yield of retained hybrid compared to commercial sowing seed for different varieties at all sites (%)
Variety | % Commercial variety | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Bool Lagoon | Bordertown | Lameroo | Minnipa | |
1 | 94 | 89 | 85 | 107 |
2 | 100 | 90 | 85 | 80 |
3 | 91 | 93 | 80 | 80 |
4 | 82 | 82 | 84 | 78 |
5 | 92 | 83 | 71 | 75 |
6 | 99 | 106 | 86 | 96 |
7 | 101 | 94 | 95 | 94 |
8 | 88 |
Table 5. Grain yield of retained and commercial hybrids as affected by fungicide at all sites 2012
Seed type | Lameroo |
Minnipa |
Bordertown |
Bool Lagoon |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fungicide | Nil | Fungicide | Nil | Fungicide | Nil | Fungicide | Nil | |
Commercial | 834 a | 825 a | 561 a | 584 a | 1,680 a | 1,656 a | 2,436 a | 2,352 a |
Retained | 709 b | 677 b | 474 b | 495 b |
1,533 a | 1,473 b | 2,306 a | 2,151 b |
Note: Within table, values followed by a different letter are significantly different.
Grain quality
Oil content of canola was significantly reduced when retained seed was used at all three sites tested (Table 6). However, protein content was not affected by retaining sowing seed compared to the commercial hybrids and glucosinolate content was only affected by retaining sowing seed at Bool Lagoon and in this case the variation was very minor compared to the acceptable limits for canola quality.
Table 6. Oil content of commercial and retained hybids in 2012
Site |
Commercial |
Retained |
---|---|---|
|
Oil % |
Oil % |
Bool Lagoon |
46.0 a |
45.4 b |
Bordertown |
42.3 a |
41.6 b |
Lameroo |
40.1 a |
39.2 b |
Note: Within table, values followed by a different letter are significantly different.
Financial returns from using retained hybrid sowing seed compared to commercial hybrid seed
Relative financial returns were calculated based on a price per tonne of $600. Oil content calculated at the normal contract basis resulted in the grain from the commercial hybrid producing a premium of about $6 per tonne over the retained grain. Likewise the cost of preparing retained sowing seed ready for sowing was calculated at $6 per hectare, graded, treated with fungicide and bagged. As can be seen from Table 7, the use of commercial hybrid sowing seed gave a good financial return over the use of retained hybrid seed for most hybrids at most sites. Using a price of $26 per kg for hybrid seed, and a sowing rate of 2.5 kg/ha, the difference in returns of over $65 per hectare produces a benefit to using commercial seed. Oil content premium and grading and fungicide cost reduced this threshold by $12 per hectare and $18 per hectare when grain yield could be expected to be 1 and 2 t/ha respectively.
Table 7. Difference in $ return from commercial and retained hybrid sowing seed for each variety at all four sites in 2012
Variety |
Increased $ return per ha of using commercial over retained hybrid sowing seed (@ $600 per tonne) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bool Lagoon |
Bordertown |
Lameroo |
Minnipa |
1 |
73 |
94 |
71 |
-16 |
2 |
-1 |
115 |
87 |
89 |
3 |
120 |
68 |
102 |
70 |
4 |
290 |
228 |
81 |
96 |
5 |
131 |
193 |
147 |
104 |
6 |
12 |
-56 |
64 |
11 |
7 |
-10 |
49 |
24 |
14 |
8 |
180 |
Summary
In many cases higher grain yields and reduced impact of blackleg occurred when commercial hybrid sowing seed was used rather than retained sowing seed. Benefits of commercial hybrid sowing seed outweighed the cost of buying that seed. Differences between hybrids are likely to be caused by the hybrid breeding system being used by the different companies and the degree of heterosis between parental lines that are used to produce each hybrid.
Similar results have been shown in recent studies in Canada where a yield reduction of up to 13% has been shown for retained hybrid canola seed.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by GRDC as a Fast Track project administered by the Southern Regional Panel. The field work was conducted by the SARDI New Variety Agronomy (NVA) group at Struan Research Centre, SA.
Contact details
Trent Potter
PO Box 819, Naracoorte SA 5271
0427 608 306
GRDC Project Code: YCR00001,
Was this page helpful?
YOUR FEEDBACK